Journey to Excellence

4-Point Scoring Rubric

Students are asked to produce a written report for a lab experiment in a science class. The following is a sample rubric to evaluate the paper.

4-OUTSTANDING 3-COMPETENT 2-NOT YET COMPETENT 1-INCOMPLETE
Content
  • Paper contains all necessary explanations
  • All charts and graphs are included and follow conventional construction and are appropriately referenced in paper.
  • Explanations are clear, logical and clearly indicate importance of results.
Content
  • Paper contains all necessary explanation.
  • Paper includes all required charts and graphs.
  • Charts and graphs follow conventional construction and are generally referenced in paper.
  • Explanations clear and logical.
Content
  • Some necessary explanations incomplete.
  • Charts and graphs are disorderly, often do not follow conventional construction, and are not always referenced or cited correctly.
  • Explanations are included but contain some errors.
Content
  • Necessary explanations difficult to understand or missing.
  • Charts and graphs are omitted, incomplete, unreferenced or missing.
  • Explanations do not follow conventional construction.
Organization
  • Introduction sparks interest. Logically organized.
  • Text flows smoothly from paragraph to paragraph. Appropriate thought provoking conclusion.
Organization
  • Introduction spurs interest, logical organization.
  • Text flows reasonably smoothly with some minor omissions.
  • Appropriate conclusion but lacking thought provoking quality.
Organization
  • Introduction included, but somewhat illogical organization.
  • Text often disorganized. Conclusion included but somewhat disorderly.
Organization
  • No introduction.
  • Illogical order and some segments left out.
  • Little evidence of order in the text.
  • Conclusions are non-existent.
Conclusions
  • Clear, unambiguous, insightful and logically based on inquiry.
Conclusions
  • Generally clear, unambiguous, and are logically based inquiry.
Conclusions
  • Somewhat ambiguous.
  • Conclusions are based on inquiry but are lacking in logic.
Conclusions
  • Omitted, ignored, incomplete, or ambiguous.

Adapted from: Doran, Rodney, Fred Chan, Pinches Tamis. Science Educator's Guide to Assessment. Arlingtion, VA: National Science Teachers Association, 1998.

back
NAD Education   Copyright © 2004-2008 North American Division Office of Education   SDA Church